L. Chirico
To Win
D. Salkova
To Win
Veronica Cepede Royg vs Louisa Chirico Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L L W L L
Form
W W W L L W W W L LH2H: Royg 1 - 2 Chirico
They have played 8 sets in total, with Royg winning 4 and Chirico winning 4. The last match between Royg and Chirico was at the W25 Sao Paulo, 16-03-2019, Semifinals, Clay with Louisa Chirico getting the victory 6-4 2-6 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Veronica Cepede Royg | 1 |
| Louisa Chirico | 2 |
W25 Sao Paulo(16-03-2019)
6
4
2
6
6
0
| Royg | Stats | Chirico |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (8-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 151 |
| 73 | Highest Rank | 58 |
| 33 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 7 |
| 61% (428-279) | Career Total W/L | 56% (329-261) |
| $490,909 | Career Prize Money | $649,838 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 2-6 6-0 |
Stats 
Louisa Chirico
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Louisa Chirico
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 1-6 7-5 7-6(5) | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 39 | Games Won | 35 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 0:56:0 | Average Match Time | 0:56:0 |
| 62% (81/130) | 1st Serve % | 54% (60/111) |
| 51% (41/81) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (35/60) |
| 53% (26/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (22/51) |
| 58% (11/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (10/18) |
| 49% (54/111) | Return Points Win % | 48% (63/130) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Veronica Cepede Royg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
80
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
67%
(
84 of
125)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
14
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
46%
(
57 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Snigur
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
65%
(
75 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
52 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fernanda Contreras Gomez
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
77
Total Points Won
82
|
0-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
82%
(
47 of
57)
0
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Sofia Da Cruz Mendonca
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
40%
(
23 of
58)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
12
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Louisa Chirico
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Erika Andreeva
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
75%
(
82 of
109)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
48 of
82)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ana Konjuh
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
73)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ysaline Bonaventure
Player
Louisa Chirico
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
42
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Louisa Chirico
57%
(
70 of
123)
1st Serve %
62%
(
85 of
137)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
52 of
85)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
42%
(
52 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
66 of
137)
137
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(6) 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
89 of
121)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
56%
(
56 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
64 of
121)
108
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Mona Barthel
73%
(
72 of
99)
1st Serve %
46%
(
41 of
90)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
12
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Taylah Preston
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
0
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
6
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
43)
0%
(
9 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
28)
0%
(
7 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
0%
(
-9 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
71 of
71)
0
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (428/279) | Win/Loss | 56% (329/261) |
| 58% (949/689) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (738/631) |
| 54% (8035/6954) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6548/6163) |
| 52% (117/106) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (125/125) |
| 67% (282/137) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (168/106) |
| 38% (8/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (31/22) |
| 48% (21/23) | Grass Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 366 | Aces Total | 878 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1036 | Total Double Faults | 2043 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:13:15 |
| 537.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 459.42 |
| 65% (16200/25047) | 1st Serve % | 59% (18898/31925) |
| 60% (9722/16200) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (11657/18898) |
| 48% (4206/8847) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (5796/13025) |
| 47% (1414/2995) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1836/3848) |
| 45% (10985/24215) | Return Points Win % | 45% (14008/31010) |
| 40% (24/36) | Slam W/L | 40% (16/24) |
| 39% (7/11) | Masters W/L | 45% (13/16) |
| 75% (33/11) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (50/51) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (51/57) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (232/141) | Challenger W/L | 59% (236/161) |
| 74% (82/29) | Futures W/L | 81% (13/3) |
| 60% (423/702) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (319/580) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (88/156) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (84/149) |
| 57% (129/228) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (108/200) |
| 88% (413/362) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (317/267) |
| 12% (413/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (317/50) |
| 22% (294/65) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (273/59) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
